CORRECTED RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (Supersedes the Record of Proceedings, dated 30 Jun 14) IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04416 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) be changed to 15 May 10. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was commissioned on 15 May 10, but after a medical condition prevented him from being a pilot, he was incorrectly told he had to be re-commissioned. He was commissioned again on 15 Sep 10 as a maintenance officer. His TFCSD in his records was incorrectly changed from 15 May 10 to 15 Sep 10 The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________ ______________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the documentation submitted by the applicant, he was initially commissioned in the Air Force on 15 May 10. On 15 Sep 10, the applicant was commissioned a second time. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends the applicant’s request be granted. The applicant was medically disqualified from attending flying or missile operations training due to color blindness. He was told by his Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) Detachment that his medical condition voided his commission. However, neither the AFROTC Registrar nor Detachment Commander have the authority to void the applicant’s commission, and being medically qualified to be a pilot was not a requirement of his commission. Once he was commissioned on 15 May 10, he was a Reserve Air Force Officer and would have needed to be discharged as such. AF/JAA previously provided legal counsel in such cases, opining that initial commissions are valid and remain in effect. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected by removing any and all documents related to his erroneous commissioning on 15 September 2010. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04416 in Executive Session on 19 Jun 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Sep 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 27 Dec 14, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jan 14.